Be Careful Who You Post For - You Might Just Get It...
You might just 'get it' from an ethics committee - and by 'it' I mean disciplinary action.
Social networking sites are becoming more and more prevalent on the internet. In fact, I recently discovered LinkedIn and I highly recommend it. However, professionals should be careful what they post on these sites.
I am specifically addressing the Q&A section on the LinkedIn website. Here, anyone can post questions and other users of the site can post replies. One of the sections in the Q&A area specifically addresses legal issues. While browsing the section, I was surprised that professionals, even partners at top shelf law firms, took the time to reply to other users' specific legal inquiries.
Now, I am all for addressing interesting issues, giving opinions, and supplying answers in the abstract. However, some of the conduct that I observed went far beyond that. For example, I found it quite common for lawyers to actually address the original poster's factual situation and giving a legal analysis.
This, I am afraid, is probably a violation of the rules of professional ethics. By addressing a poster's problem, you are arguably creating an attorney-client relationship. More importantly, you are supplying legal advice in an unauthorized manner (at least in NY, I believe). Lastly, an attorney may get into some real trouble with their malpractice insurance provider (see my earlier posting below).
Social networking sites are becoming more and more prevalent on the internet. In fact, I recently discovered LinkedIn and I highly recommend it. However, professionals should be careful what they post on these sites.
I am specifically addressing the Q&A section on the LinkedIn website. Here, anyone can post questions and other users of the site can post replies. One of the sections in the Q&A area specifically addresses legal issues. While browsing the section, I was surprised that professionals, even partners at top shelf law firms, took the time to reply to other users' specific legal inquiries.
Now, I am all for addressing interesting issues, giving opinions, and supplying answers in the abstract. However, some of the conduct that I observed went far beyond that. For example, I found it quite common for lawyers to actually address the original poster's factual situation and giving a legal analysis.
This, I am afraid, is probably a violation of the rules of professional ethics. By addressing a poster's problem, you are arguably creating an attorney-client relationship. More importantly, you are supplying legal advice in an unauthorized manner (at least in NY, I believe). Lastly, an attorney may get into some real trouble with their malpractice insurance provider (see my earlier posting below).
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home